There has been a blood throated screakeen over petty suits by petty non-contributors against money making contributors of popular content… Oh Jesus balls, Disney… Continuing… And the profitable artistic community has finally found a weapon of ultimate resort to creamate the lawyers prosecuting these cases, the “an attack against one is an attack against all” defense. I don’t like this, but my people were under threat, and I was hired to construct a defense. Hey Dan, that’s a good soul there, here’s your fee.

You see, it is possible to cross license intellectual property of any sort under the terms of contract law, and you can write a contract to bind the govenrment to enforce ANY terms permitted by law, even if one of the cross licencees is currently being sued by a maggot for copyright infringement. What happens then? The cross licensees now have full rights to counter sue the original litigant and no, just as in the case of the LLC, the original litigant CANNOT force a class action lawsuit, and rightly so. What this gives the cross licencees the power to do is to distribute the load of the lawsuit over them all while forcing the litigating lawyer to seek injunctions INDIVIDUALLY against every licensee. Whackamole asshole, my art stays up and your art get’s pushed DOWN. AND I GUESS YOUR LAWYER JUST DECLARED BANKRUPTCY TO GET OUT FROM UNDER. And now you worse than stranded, you self representing in a litigation the new NATO ain’t under any obligation to drop. Ain’t that funny.

Note Promise Keepers, Minute Men, Guardian Angels, Psalm 95 or any other lay dominated volunteer organization subject to blackmail by disgruntled employees0Y other lay dominated non